Rabu, 24 April 2019

Buying Time: On Portland’s Big First-Round Win and Oklahoma City’s Murky Future - The Ringer

With the score of Game 5 in a phenomenally competitive series between the Trail Blazers and Thunder knotted at 115, all I could think was: “He’s gonna run out of time.”

After 47 wildly entertaining minutes, Damian Lillard had the ball and a chance. He’d authored a historic, wreathed-in-flames first half, outdueling Paul George and Russell Westbrook to stake Portland to a nine-point lead late in the third quarter.

He’d seen that advantage disappear in a puff of smoke, as Oklahoma City surged behind an energetic and effective small-ball unit with Jerami Grant at center to go up by 15 with seven minutes to go. He’d pushed Portland back to level, with the help of some huge buckets from CJ McCollum and four clutch free throws by Maurice Harkless. Then, with the shot clock turned off, Lillard stared down George from the edge of the Blazers’ half-court logo, dribbling the seconds away.

“He’s two steps inside half court, he hasn’t even started his move, and there’s 3.5 seconds left,” I thought. “What’s he doing? He’s gonna run out of time.”

I should’ve known, though. Time is sort of Damian Lillard’s specialty.

A left-to-right dribble, a slide step to the right, and that’s all it took. George, one of the best perimeter defenders in the world, jumped as soon as he saw Lillard begin to pull up, and extended his right arm as far forward as he could, but it wasn’t far enough. The shot was away, and it was pure, and it was in, with nothing but zeroes—fitting—on the clock. Blazers win, 118-115. Blazers win, four games to one. Time to pack up and go, Thunder. Get home safe.

“That’s a bad, bad shot,” George groused after the game. Except that, in Lillard’s hands, in this series, it wasn’t: He took five shots from 30-plus feet in Round 1 … and made all of them. No wonder he looked so placid afterward; the only person who wasn’t surprised that Dame made the shot was Dame himself.

That 36-foot, step-back, series-winning missile gave Lillard an even 50 points in Game 5 on 17-for-33 shooting, setting a new personal playoff high and a new Blazers single-game postseason franchise scoring record. (He added seven rebounds, six assists, three steals, and a block in 45 unforgettable minutes.) It made Lillard just the 24th player in NBA history to hang half-a-hundred in a playoff game, and only the second to make 10 3-pointers in one. (Westbrook and Thunder coach Billy Donovan likely remember the first all too well.) And the first to drill a buzzer-beating game-winner to clinch a playoff series since … well, himself, against the Rockets in 2014.

Do you remember what Lillard said back then, just after he’d ripped Houston’s heart out in Rip City? Fresh off the icepick dagger that introduced him to the broader basketball world as an ascendant superstar, he said, matter-of-factly, “That’s definitely the biggest shot of my life—so far.”

That ranking now needs a rewrite. After three first-round exits in four postseasons and consecutive sweeps that threatened to break him and his Blazers, five years after the moment that made him, Lillard now has another. And holy shit, is it a great one.

“After last year, I kept telling people: Sometimes, it’s just your turn to go through something,” he told TNT’s Stephanie Ready on the court after the rapture. “And when you keep fighting, and you keep working through it and stay together, it’s a reward waiting for you. We kept working, and I think this is the beginning of our result.”

If Tuesday marked a new beginning for Lillard and the Blazers, it also felt like an inflection point for their counterparts.

Oklahoma City still hasn’t won a playoff series since Kevin Durant bolted to the Bay. In 2017, you could chalk up the team’s first-round loss to Westbrook, who had earned MVP honors for carrying a lacking post-Durant Thunder roster to 47 wins, being totally outgunned in a matchup with James Harden’s 55-win Rockets. Last season’s model featured more firepower, but you could still kind of write off an opening-round loss to the young and hungry Jazz as the grim but natural outcome of the unsuccessful science experiment of adding an about-to-enter-free-agency George and a fading Carmelo Anthony.

This season was supposed to be different. Melo was gone, swapped for Dennis Schröder and replaced in the starting lineup by Grant. George was back with a clear head after committing to a four-year max deal to forge a long-term partnership with Westbrook. The Thunder looked for four months like a real challenger for Western supremacy, thanks to George’s MVP-level play, an elite defense, and Westbrook’s force of will. But then George’s shoulders started to buckle under all the weight they were carrying, the schedule turned nasty, and OKC stumbled into the playoffs with a sub-.500 record and negative point differential after the All-Star break.

Even so, they were favored to beat these Blazers, whom they’d swept during the regular season, and who would be entering the playoffs without center Jusuf Nurkic, Lillard’s premier pick-and-roll partner and Portland’s top rim protector. But some of the same old problems continued to rear their ugly heads: a lack of bankable shooting (only Grant and Terrance Ferguson made more than 35 percent of their 3-point tries in Round 1); a shaky roster with liabilities and question marks at nearly every position (both Markieff Morris and Raymond Felton saw rotation minutes, while Steven Adams watched the whole fourth quarter of Game 5); and the worrying deterioration of Westbrook’s jumper (he shot just 19-for-63, 30.2 percent, outside the paint against Portland).

It was a roller-coaster series for Westbrook that both showcased the most effective aspects of his game and highlighted his worst shot-jacking, rhythm-wrecking tendencies. He combined the two in Game 5. Westbrook helped OKC build an early lead by focusing on facilitating while taking a backseat to a red-hot George. But when George went to the bench with foul trouble midway through the second quarter, Westbrook predictably went into overdrive to try to fill the void; he’d go 2-for-11 from the field in the frame, missing several gimme layups and some ill-advised pull-ups.

At one point in the third quarter, Westbrook seemed reluctant to take the open looks the Blazers were giving him. Later, though, he served as the catalyst for a 15-4 quarter-ending run that gave the Thunder the lead entering the fourth. As the Blazers kept chopping down their 15-point fourth-quarter deficit, Westbrook struggled to find the right balance; on some trips, he’d defer, only to see Schröder and George come up short, and on others, he’d force the issue, leading to tough misses and turnovers. He put together another monster line—29 points, 14 assists, 11 rebounds, four steals, and two blocks in 44 minutes—but took 31 shots, missed 20 of them, and again seemed to run a little too hot for comfort, and for his team’s good, at the most critical juncture of the season. His nemesis, on the other hand, remained cool as hell.

It was clear early that Lillard was going for the knockout punch in Game 5. He scored 19 points in the first quarter, stayed on the floor to start the second rather than taking his customary rest (perhaps because early foul trouble shelved McCollum for the bulk of the half), and just kept cooking, racking up 34 points before intermission—the most in a playoff half in 14 years, and five off Sleepy Floyd’s record.

Even as he poured in wild shot after wild shot, though, it seemed like Lillard’s pulse barely quickened. He managed to lean into a maximalist offensive approach (Westbrook must have respected it, on some level) without wavering or playing on tilt. Lillard dominated this game and this series—a first-round-high 33 points per game, 48.1 percent from 3 on 10.8 attempts a night—with the confidence of a man who knew his moment had come, and who was about to derive a hell of a lot of satisfaction from ending the season of some dudes who’d talked a little too spicy a little too early for his taste.

“I think after Game 3, Dennis Schröder was out there pointing to his wrist,” Lillard told reporters after the game. “They was out there doing all these celebrations and doing all this stuff. We kept our composure and after one win that’s what they decided to do. And we was just like, ‘OK, what we want to do is win four games. And then when we win those four games, there’s not going to be nothing to talk about.’”

There didn’t need to be. Dame’s dagger spoke loudly enough.

“There’s been a lot of back and forth, a lot of talk and all this stuff, and that was the last word,” he said. “That was having the last word.”

In Oklahoma City, the talk will turn to what comes next—how to build a stronger team around the huge contracts of Westbrook, George, and Adams, whether general manager Sam Presti needs to consider tearing down what he’s put together to try to build something better, and what another first-round flameout means for the legacy of the 2017 MVP. In Portland, though, there’s another series to prepare for—either a trip to Denver or a visit from the Spurs. Soon enough, Damian Lillard will once again have the ball and a chance, this time to lead Portland to its first conference finals berth since 2000. Thanks to a masterful five-game performance and a shot that will live forever, the Blazers are still ticking; Dame and Co. aren’t out of time just yet.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.theringer.com/nba/2019/4/24/18514096/portland-trail-blazers-oklahoma-city-thunder-first-round

2019-04-24 13:55:10Z
CBMiaWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZXJpbmdlci5jb20vbmJhLzIwMTkvNC8yNC8xODUxNDA5Ni9wb3J0bGFuZC10cmFpbC1ibGF6ZXJzLW9rbGFob21hLWNpdHktdGh1bmRlci1maXJzdC1yb3VuZNIBdmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZXJpbmdlci5jb20vcGxhdGZvcm0vYW1wL25iYS8yMDE5LzQvMjQvMTg1MTQwOTYvcG9ydGxhbmQtdHJhaWwtYmxhemVycy1va2xhaG9tYS1jaXR5LXRodW5kZXItZmlyc3Qtcm91bmQ

Nope, Damian Lillard's series winner wasn't a bad shot - ESPN

There's no doubt that Damian Lillard's shot to end the Portland Trail Blazers' first-round series against the Oklahoma City Thunder was one of the most incredible postseason shots we've ever seen. But was it a good shot?

After the game, Paul George, the man defending Lillard, weighed in.

"That's a bad, bad shot," George said. "I don't care what anybody says. That's a bad shot. But hey, he made it. That story won't be told that it was a bad shot. We live with that."

Well, maybe not.

As a whole, the league made just 25.9 percent of shots from that distance, so it's fair to say that for most dudes, shots from that range aren't very "good."

Lillard isn't most dudes. He sank 39.2 percent of his shots from 30 to 40 feet this season.

That's pretty good.

On average, NBA shooters convert 35.5 percent of their 3s, and George sank 38.6 percent of his 3-point tries this season. In other words: Deep-space Dame appears to be as good of an option as the typical NBA 3-point look, or even an average Paul George 3-point attempt.

If it's true that an average Paul George 3-pointer is a good shot, which it is, then an average Damian Lillard bomb from 30-plus feet is also a good shot (at least according to this 51-shot sample).

NBA 3-point shooters are better than ever, and bolder than ever. When Stephen Curry hit his famous 37-foot game winner in Oklahoma City in 2016, he also challenged the definition of a good shot. Like Lillard, Curry is able to convert 30- to 40-footers around 40 percent of the time, which is pretty good by any standard. These days, you can't claim a good or a bad shot without accounting for who is doing the shooting.

Dudes like Lillard, Curry and Trae Young are special because their range extends far beyond what was normal or acceptable even five years ago. That trio combined to hit 71 of their 186 attempts on 30- to 40-footers this season, converting at a 38 percent clip while making up the entire top three in attempts from that distance.

These guys are leading a new generation of shooters who are expanding the good shot territory at a rapid clip, and though George's assertion that Lillard's attempt was bad may have been true just a few years back, it's not true any longer.

Regardless of whether Lillard's game winner was a "bad, bad shot," one thing is for certain: Dame is a bad, bad man.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/26593473/nope-damian-lillard-series-winner-bad-shot

2019-04-24 13:55:02Z
52780275985545

The Golden Knights Are Furious Over How Their Season Was "Stolen" - Deadspin

Photo: Ezra Shaw (Getty)

Let’s get this out of the way right at the outset: Yes, the Vegas Golden Knights could have avoided all of this controversy—and their elimination—by simply not allowing allowing four goals in 4:01. One of the weirdest and wildest comebacks in recent memory, a Game 7 eventually won by the Sharks 5-4 in overtime, did not have to hinge on a questionable call. After the call, the Knights could have nullified things by just not being the second team in NHL history to give up four goals on a second power play. But they did, and so the call matters very much in retrospect, and Vegas will be stewing over it for a long, long time.

Jonathan Marchessault repeated a reporter’s question. “Was it stolen? Yeah. It was 3-0.”

It was a 3-0 Vegas lead, with 10:47 left to play in the third period. That’s when Cody Eakin checked Joe Pavelski across the chest, sending him stumbling backward into Paul Stastny and falling awkwardly to the ice. He hit his head and appeared to lose consciousness, blood dripping onto the ice.

A truly scary moment, and now, in Sharks lore, an emotional and inspirational one. “It almost made you cry,” Joe Thornton said. “We love him so much. You never want to see a teammate get hurt like that. It’s a tough break for him. So you hold him as hard you can, get him off the ice and get him better ... The boys, they got together and said, this is for Pavs.” (The Sharks have not yet issued a medical update on Pavelski.)

Advertisement

But from the other dressing room, the call was a travesty. Marchessault:

“I really hope Joe Pavelski is OK. You never want to see something bad like that happen. But it’s a fucking joke To call five minutes for that? It changed the whole outcome of the game. Like, seriously, what is that? It’s so disappointing. The game’s not even close. It’s 3-0. Call a two? OK. But a five? For something you don’t even see? You just call the outcome. It’s a fucking joke. It’s embarrassing. That’s what it is.”

At issue was how and when the five-minute major and game misconduct were called, and Marchessault has a point: The officials on the ice didn’t appear to see the hit, or least didn’t think it was whistle-worthy until they noticed how badly Pavelski was hurt. The video above makes clear that no penalty was signaled for until well after the hit, when Pavelski was already down and out. To make matters worse, Knights coach Gerard Gallant said the refs explained to him on the ice that Eakin had checked Pavelski in the face, “and as we all saw, that didn’t happen.”

Advertisement

After the game, series officiating supervisor Don VanMassenhoven issued a statement on the call: “The referees called a cross-checking penalty for an infraction that caused a significant injury. In their judgment, the infraction and its result merited a major penalty.”

And so the Sharks reeled off four quick goals in insane succession, Marchessault got one back for Vegas with 47 seconds left in regulation to put off summer vacation just a little longer, and then Barclay Goodrow sent the Sharks to the second round and a date with Colorado with his goal at 18:19 of overtime. A brutal game in a brutal series for the Golden Knights, who less than a week ago were up 3-1 in the series and looked like world-beaters.

“Last year we were in the Stanley Cup finals and it was tough to lose,” Gallant said. “Tonight was tougher than that.”

Advertisement

Marchessault? Still angry.

They called a bad call, and look where we are. Summer’s starting, fucking five months now until game one when the regular season starts. It’s awful. You think we were ready to get our summer going here? We’re a great team. It’s unbelievable.”

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://deadspin.com/the-golden-knights-are-furious-over-how-their-season-wa-1834266271

2019-04-24 12:56:00Z
52780275131727

Report: Marshawn Lynch retires - NBCSports.com

We're a little more than 48 hours away from the start of the 2019 NFL Draft, and it sounds like almost no one knows how things will shake out. 

The Arizona Cardinals own the No. 1 overall pick, and many expect them to draft Oklahoma quarterback Kyler Murray to pair with new coach Kliff Kingsbury.

However, a report leaked over the weekend that the Cardinals were planning to pass on Murray, leaving many to wonder how far the Heisman Trophy winner would fall should Arizona go in a different direction.

As it turns out, Murray might not have an Aaron Rodgers-type wait in the green room if the Cardinals pass on him, as many see the Raiders as a potential suitor at No. 4 overall. Coach Jon Gruden and general manager Mike Mayock have publicly supported current quarterback Derek Carr, but it sounds like Gruden isn't all that high on his signal-caller. He is, however, quite high on Murray, according to ESPN's Todd McShay.

"Jon Gruden loves Kyler Murray, I'm told. And does not necessarily love Derek Carr, I'm told, which is going to be the interesting thing to see," McShay said on Monday's episode of "Get Up!," via Bleacher Report. "It may not play out in this draft, but I think at some point, it's going to come to an end between Carr and Jon Gruden, from what I hear."

Last Friday, Gruden and Mayock reportedly closed ranks, sending all of their scouts home so they could finish their draft prep surrounded only by a few trusted members of the organization.

With a number of leaks coming out over the past few weeks, it's possible the decision to close ranks came out of the Raiders' desire to try and find a way to move up and take Murray while maintaining plausible deniability should the talks fall through. Oakland has four picks in the top 35, so the Silver and Black undoubtedly have the trade ammunition needed to move up to the top spot if they so desired.

[RELATED:Why Raiders might be looking to trade up for Kyler Murray]

But the Raiders have a number of holes to address in the draft. With game-changers like Quinnen Williams possibly being available at No. 4, the Silver and Black might want to restock their defense and worry about quarterback at a later date.

But if Gruden really does "love" Murray, all bets are off.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.nbcsports.com/bayarea/raiders/report-marshawn-lynch-retires

2019-04-24 11:26:22Z
52780276174078

Damian Lillard Hits The Most Epic Game Winner In NBA History - BBALLBREAKDOWN

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKvwipcXL9g

2019-04-24 11:00:11Z
52780275170223

Damian Lillard Postgame Interview | Thunder vs Trail Blazers Game 5 - NBA

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cL0N1JDvtME

2019-04-24 07:28:15Z
52780275170223

NBA Top 10 Plays of the Night | April 23, 2019 - NBA

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqWtbIcQc14

2019-04-24 07:16:55Z
52780275170223